I might put more stock in FoxNews entertainment coverage if they could spell the word correctly
After bringing up Heath Ledger and showing some video of a throng of paparazzi outside of his house, O'Reilly clumsily segued to Oscar nominees. Reviewing the list, O'Reilly declared that he wouldn't see Atonement because it's British and he "doesn't understand the accents" ... ok. He went on to say that Juno was the best movie on the list (haven't seen it, can't disagree) and that There Will Be Blood was unwatchable because people can't "watch oil" for nearly three hours. He also dismissed No Country for Old Men because he didn't understand the ending. Insightful.
The next part was the most entertaine-ing though. Along with his FoxNews cronies (read: scrubs) Jill Dobson and Bill McCuddy, O'Reilly launched into a diatribe about how the Best Picture nominees don't match up with the top box office earners of the year. Huh? So what? I guess it was an attempt at his usual "sticking up for the common man so nobody can challenge me unless they're against America argument, but it really made no sense at all.
O'Reilly jumped the shark in 2002. He used to actually be able to at least provide entertainment value, but now his subjects (whether people or topics of discussion) are just punching bags. Although, I still get immense pleasure from reading his sexual harassment complaint. I mean, what guy doesn't masturbate with a vibrator?
